home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
WINMX Assorted Textfiles
/
Ebooks.tar
/
Text - Society - Journalists Favorite Hoax Petrifications.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2003-08-15
|
13KB
|
232 lines
A Journalists' Favorite Hoax: Petrifications
By Fred Fedler
NCSA Member #675
Historians are familiar with a few of the media's hoaxes, especially the
hoaxes published by famous dailies on the East Coast. Newspapers, however,
have published thousands of hoaxes. Most of the hoaxes have been lost or
forgotten, especially the minor hoaxes published by smaller papers --
including weeklies -- in the South and West.
Journalists created hoaxes to entertain and fool their readers. Journalists
also wanted to beat their rivals: to create interesting, exciting (and
exclusive) stories for their readers. Before the invention of the telegraph,
journalists also created some hoaxes for a more practical reason: to help
fill the empty spaces in their papers.
It was difficult, however, for journalists to create hoaxes about topics
that were truly new. Newspapers published too many of the hoaxes, and
journalists' experiences -- and imaginations -- were limited. Thus, while
creating a hoax, most journalists selected a familiar topic: a topic they
had already thought or read about.
Journalists created hundreds of hoaxes about unusual animals, often
monsters. Journalists created other hoaxes about natural phenomena:
earthquakes, tornadoes and volcanoes, for example. While writing about the
topics, journalists tried to surpass their rivals. If journalists decided to
write about a monster, for example, they tried to create a monster that was
bigger, louder and more dangerous than any of the monsters described by
their rivals.
Petrifications were another popular topic, especially among editors in the
West. Stories about petrified men became so common that Mark Twain tried to
stop them. Predictably, Twain failed. Stories about unusual petrifications
continued to appear for years after his death. One of the last stories
appeared in a Wisconsin weekly. Typically, the story has reappeared dozens
of times since then, often as a factual account of a genuine event.
The phenomenon is a common one. When journalists create a hoax, no matter
how preposterous, some readers will believe it. Moreover, other journalists
will notice and reprint the story, not knowing (or perhaps caring) that the
details are fictitious. For years after that, Americans browsing through old
newspapers will find copies of it, and other media will reprint the copies.
Thus, a good hoax may continue to appear and reappear for 50 or even 100
years. Unfortunately, it is difficult, often impossible, for historians to
determine who created the hoax and which newspaper was the first to publish
it. Three of my favorite petrification hoaxes follow:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Petrification of a Human
[Image]
A San Francisco paper, the Alta, published a story about one of the
West's most unusual petrifications. The story appeared in 1858 and was
written in the form of a letter. The author, Dr. Friedrich Lichtenberger,
said he had witnessed a death so shocking the he wanted to warn everyone
about it.
Dr. Lichtenberger explained that a Prussian named Ernest Flucterspiegel had
accompanied him on an expedition that began in San Francisco. Because of a
storm, they were forced to camp near a small stream. It was still early, Dr.
Lichtenberger continued, and several members of the expedition decided to
look for gold. They failed to find any of the valuable ore but amused
themselves by breaking open geodes: rounded masses of quartz with hollow
centers. The geodes varied in size from a few inches to several feet in
diameter, and some contained a transparent fluid. Most, however, contained
so little of the fluid that it never attracted much attention.
Flucterspiegel found a geode containing a half pint of liquid, and he
promptly swallowed it. While returning to their camp, Flucterspiegel
complained of a pain in the epigastric and left hypochondriac regions. By
the time Flucterspiegel reached their camp, he was speechless. The doctor
laid him in a bed, much alarmed, but not guessing the cause of his illness.
Attempts to make Flucterspiegel swallow some brandy failed. Cold beads of
sweat covered his face. His pulse was feeble, and his heartbeat violent and
irregular. In 15 minutes he was dead.
A companion informed Dr. Lichtenberger that Flucterspiegel had swallowed the
fluid in the geode, and the doctor concluded that it was some sort of
mineral poison. He could not, however, conceive of any poison which acted so
rapidly, nor caused such peculiar symptoms.
The doctor observed an unusual rigidity in Flucterspiegel's limbs. It
increased minute by minute, "until in the course of two-and-one-half hours
the victim's entire body became stiff and inflexible as a board."
The doctor decided to conduct a post mortem examination. He assumed that the
cause of death was some poisonous substance in the geode and proceeded at
once to examine the victim's stomach and part of his intestines. As Dr.
Lichtenberger made the initial incision, his knife created a grating
sensation, and he noticed Flucterspiegel's smaller blood vessels were solid
and apparently ossified. The doctor then removed Flucterspiegel's stomach.
Upon slitting it open, he found several masses as hard as the hardest
quartz. The doctor also removed some muscle and lumps of undigested
potatoes, all equally hard. The contents of Flucterspiegel's stomach had
turned to stone.
The doctor next cut an opening in the victim's chest and discovered that his
heart was a natural color, but hard as a piece of red jasper. Dr.
Lichtenberger used a small hatchet to separate the heart from its
connections and, with some difficulty, broke it in pieces. "The larger blood
vessels were all as rigid as pipe stems," he reported, "and in some cases
the petrified blood could be cracked out from the veins"
For future investigation, Dr. Lichtenberger saved portions of
Flucterspiegel's petrified food and bile, as well as pieces of his heart,
lungs and blood vessels. Members of the expedition then buried
Flucterspiegel's remains on a little island, erecting stones to mark the
spot.
After returning to Fort Langley, Dr. Lichtenberger examined the specimens he
saved. He applied nitric, sulfuric and hydrochloric acids, but nothing
seemed to have any effect whatever on the petrified blood. After various
experiments, Dr. Lichtenberger prepared a small quantity of fluorhydric
acid, and this, to his great satisfaction, acted upon it rapidly. It also
acted upon the contents ofFlucterspiegel's stomach and heart. After still
more tests, the whole question resolved itself in the doctor's mind. He
concluded that the liquid which Flucterspiegel consumed contained an immense
quantity of silicic acid, and that the acid caused a petrification of
certain substances within his body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Twain's First Hoax
Mark Twain moved to Nevada in 1861 but failed as a miner looking for silver
and gold. Twain submitted several articles to the Territorial Enterprise in
Virginia City and was promptly offered a job on its staff. The Enterprise
was already one of the best papers in the West. Its editor-in-chief, Joseph
T. Goodman, employed a talented staff and encouraged his reporters to write
interesting features, including hoaxes.
Twain's first hoax, "A Petrified Man," appeared a few weeks after he began
to work for the paper. Twain reported that a petrified man, about 100 years
old, had been found nearby. Every limb and feature was perfectly preserved,
Twain wrote, even the man╒s left leg, which had evidently been a wooden one.
Twain added that water dripping down the man's back deposited a limestone
sediment that glued the man's mummified remains to the rock upon which he
sat. A Justice "Sewell" or "Sowell" rushed to the spot to conduct an inquest
and determined that the man died from protracted exposure, Twain concluded.
Twain had two reasons for creating the hoax. First, he wanted to ridicule a
fad: journalists' frequent creation of stories about petrifications. Twain
explained that: "One could scarcely pick up a paper without finding in it
one or two glorified discoveries of this kind. The mania was becoming a
little ridiculous. I was a brand-new local editor in Virginia City, and I
felt called upon to destroy this growing evil╔ I chose to kill the
petrification mania with a delicate, a very delicate satire."
Twain also wanted revenge. He was mad at the region's new coroner and
Justice of the Peace, a man named "Sewall." Twain╒s hoax portrayed Sewall as
a fool who rushed to the scene to learn what caused the death of a man who
had been dead (and turned to stone) for 100 years. While writing the hoax,
Twain refused to even spell Sewall's name correctly.
Like other journalists, Twain was surprised by the public's response to his
hoax; by the fact that many of his readers believed it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wisconsin Petrified Man
Manley Hinshaw created Wisconsins' most successful hoax and, typically,
fooled readers throughout the United States. Other journalists have
continued to reprint Hinshaw's story for more than 60 years -- and their
readers continue to believe it. On January 21, 1926, Hinshaw's story
appeared on the front page of a small weekly: the Rusk County Journal. It
reported that two loggers had found the remains of a French explorer lost in
1663. The explorer had been trapped inside a basswood tree, and his body had
become petrified there. Now, it was being sent to the State Historical
Society in Madison.
Hinshaw apparently wrote the story because he needed something to fill an
empty space in that weeks edition of the Journal. Local readers realized
that it was a hoax but had also read Hinshaw's earlier stories, including a
story about an inventor who extracted static electricity from the air, then
used the electricity to run a large motor.
Other newspapers, even a national news agency, picked up Hinshaw's story
about the petrified explorer, and reprinted it as truth. As a result, people
as far away as Oregon sent the Journal a flood of letters and telegrams,
asking for more details and photographs.
Readers who wanted to see the mummified remains drove to the State
Historical Society's museum in Madison. An expert insisted that the remains
had not been brought to the museum and probably never would be. The expert
explained that, to be petrified -- to be turned to stone -- a body's
decaying cells would have to be replaced by mineral matter. And it was
impossible for the sap in a basswood tree to carry that type of mineral
matter to a decaying body.
Other journalists find Hinshaw's story while paging through old editions
looking for stories to reprint in their newspapers' "Yesteryear" columns.
The columns reprint stories 5 to 50 years old. Some, however, reprint
stories 100 years old. In 1976, the 50th anniversary of Wisconsin's most
famous hoax, the Ladysmith News received a flurry of letters, apparently as
a result of the storys' republication in the column. The Ladysmith News
received more letters in 1981, the storys' 55th anniversary.
A book published in 1982 added to the publics' confusion. The book,
Wisconsin's Famous and Historic Trees, reprinted Hinshaw's story without
explaining that it was a hoax. In 1984, a newspaper copied Hinshaw's story
from the book The story goes as follows:
"Recently a firm in Chippewa Falls acquired a tract of land near here.
Monday morning two employees of the firm, Art Charpin and Walter Latsch of
Owen, set about clearing the land for their company.
"They noticed a large basswood, and felled it. Even though it had a large
home some 30 feet above the ground, it looked like good timber. Monday
afternoon they struck their saws into the basswood at a point where they
expected a cut would give them a 20-foot log and eliminate the portion
affected by the large hole. All went well until about half way through the
log the saw stuck in a rock. Latsch and Charpin cursed because they knew
their saw blade would be dulled.
"After some labor, the men turned the tree trunk over and began a cut on the
other side. Before long the same difficulty was encountered, but by turning
the trunk about, the cut was finally completed, and the log rolled away,
revealing what threw the men into a bad fright.
"There, staring up at them, was the ashen face of a man. And there, encased
in the living trunk of the tree, was the entire body of a man, fully clothed
in a coarse homespun and buckskins, which fell away when touched, and the
head had been covered with long hair which had been tucked up under a
Coonskin cap. With the mummified body in the hollow tree was an old
muzzle-loading flintlock rifle and a muzzle-loading pistol of fanciful
design."